Every team assessment you have used produces a report. A report is a snapshot of a team that no longer exists by the time it is read. TeamCharacter is the living system underneath — the composite recomputes the moment the team changes, and every read is traceable to measured character.
Investor preview · reference cohort · July 2026
Clifton Strengths has been completed by 36 million people and produces a team grid. A leader receives a readout. Someone joins six months later and nothing updates. The industry has sold the artifact and never built the system.
132 forced-choice items, roughly 25 minutes. Within-pillar pairs, so no one can inflate a dimension by endorsing every good statement. The signature belongs to the individual permanently and travels with them to any team they join.
Twenty-two traits and eight anchors per member compose into a team-level read across influence, communication and collaboration — plus the character substrate under all five Lencioni layers.
Someone joins, someone leaves, someone retakes. The composite recomputes, the leader gets a plain-language note on what structurally changed, and the history compounds.
Below is a ten-member leadership team rendered from a real composite fixture. Every number on every tab is computed in your browser from the underlying trait data by the same formulas the platform runs in production. Remove a member from the roster and watch the entire read change. That single behaviour is the product.
The living roster. Toggle any member out to simulate a departure — every intelligence output on every tab recomputes immediately.
| Member | Leads | Carries |
|---|
How much collective influence this team currently carries — the room to run, the freedom from oversight, the recognition of impact. Trust is the mechanism; influence is what teams actually want.
A pipeline, not three separate tests. Agreement without understanding is compliance or phantom consensus, and it collapses under pressure. Each gate has a closing driver — the trait whose absence most reliably stops the gate from closing.
Assertiveness against openness, loaded by measured traits rather than by a preference quiz. The mode a team defaults to is the mode it will reach for when the stakes rise — including when that default costs it.
Every leadership buyer knows one framework. Lencioni named the pyramid; nobody measured what sits underneath it. Each layer here is answered from character composition rather than from a retrospective survey of how the team felt last quarter.
Reference cohort composite. Names are fixture names; no client data appears in this preview.
Character is enacted preference under choice pressure. Every number above traces to a forced choice a member actually made, not to a self-rating they were free to inflate.
132 items paired inside a pillar, so endorsing everything positive is structurally impossible. The format is chosen to suppress social desirability bias, which is the failure mode of every Likert-scale team tool in the category.
The same composite always renders the same sentence. Reads come from a canonical content library with golden-manifest byte-parity tests, not from a model improvising prose about your team.
Two external psychometric reviews completed in 2026. Where a construct could not be defended — a composite trust score whose normalisation was arbitrary — it was dropped rather than shipped.
No member's name appears at the bottom of any ranking, anywhere, ever. The self-orientation carrier is never named on a leader-visible surface. These are enforced by regression tests, not by editorial discipline.
Portal, briefing PDF, facilitation deck, per-member reports and this workspace all consume a single emit boundary. When the engine improves, every surface inherits it without a rewrite.
A member's character signature is owned by the member, not the employer. They carry it to the next team, which is what makes team adoption compound into network adoption.
Pricing
The WHOM assessment costs nothing, for anyone, always. Start with your team's character signature at no cost, and pay only when you want the intelligence that tells you what to do with it.
For the leader who wants to see the shape of their team.
$0
Up to 10 members
For a leader who wants to understand one team properly.
$79/month
Up to 20 members
Everything in Free, plus
For a leader running an organisation, not a single team.
$249/month
Up to 50 members
Everything in Starter, plus
For an organisation running performance on character.
$500/month and up
50+ members
Everything in Growth, plus
The people on your team own their character signature permanently, across every job they ever hold. It costs them nothing, and it is theirs, not yours.
An AI coach that starts every session already holding a precise, verified map of how this person operates — no intake, no warm-up. On the individual side it translates the trust read into concrete influence moves. On the team side it does the same for collective influence.
The individual report answers who am I. The team role report answers who am I here — the member located inside the team's composition, with the contribution only they carry.
The composite already names what the team structurally lacks. That gap is a hiring brief, and the same instrument scores the candidate against it.
A leader carrying a self-orientation signature is a materially different risk from a junior member carrying the same one. Weighting character configuration by positional authority is on the roadmap, and nothing in market does it.